Process + AI

Not Every Process Needs an Agent

The newest technology is not automatically the best tool for every process. The work should determine the technology.
Brad Badovick · The Opportunity Foundry, LLC · September 8, 2026 · 4 minute read
Three AI agents needlessly move documents through an elaborate machine while a simple conveyor runs beneath them

The rise of AI agents has triggered a familiar corporate reflex: assuming the newest technology has made everything that came before it obsolete.

Gartner recently published research asking whether AI agents will replace robotic process automation and business process automation. The full recommendation is available only to subscribers, but the public abstract confirms that application leaders are actively questioning whether their existing automation technologies are now outdated.

I believe this is the wrong starting question because it assumes too much. The question is not which technology won. It is which technology is best suited for the task.

Different Technologies Solve Different Problems

The agent does not need to own every step simply because an agent is involved.

The Strongest Design May Combine All Four

An agent might interpret an unusual customer request. A machine-learning model might calculate its risk. A workflow could route the decision through the appropriate approval. RPA could then record the approved transaction in a legacy system.

This is also why starting with the technology is especially dangerous when the organization does not have its house in order. If the process lacks a clear outcome, reliable inputs, decision rights, controls, and defined exception paths, adding an agent will not create that discipline. It may simply introduce more variability into an already unstable system.

Start With the Work

Then choose the technology.

AI may be the newest tool in the toolbox. That does not make it the best tool for every job or the right place to begin the conversation.

← Back to All Insights